Rewarding Syria?

Writing on the Syria Comment blog, Joshua Landis asks: "Why are US analysts surprised that Syria arms Hizbullah?" It's a good question, reflecting a lack of balance in US policy when it comes to Syria and Israel.

Referring to current debate about sending a US ambassador to Syria, Landis suggests that the neocons have got it the wrong way round:

"Neocons try to make out that the return of an ambassador is a favour to Syria, when in actuality it is driven by US interests. Washington wants to be able to gain intelligence and have some small influence on Syria, which returning an ambassador will provide it. Syria is clearly gratified to have relations return to what they were before President Bush decided to invade Iraq with thoughts of regime change in Syria, but relations between the two countries will not be normal or good."

In the meantime, he says, Washington "is not pressuring Israel to give back the Golan Heights – at least it has made no statement about the illegality of Israel’s occupation or the right of the 300,000 Golanis, whose parents or who were themselves expelled from the Heights in 1967 in complete disregard for international law."

Landis continues:

"The real way to encourage peace is by allowing the balance of power between Israel and its Arab neighbours to come into equilibrium. This is the first principle of realism. American analysts swear by this principle in every corner of the globe but the Middle East. When it comes to Israelis and Arabs, Washington somehow has convinced itself that only by skewing the balance of power in Israel’s favour, will peace materialise.

"It doesn’t really matter whether one approves or disproves of this state of affairs – it is the present reality. The US does not offer Syria a chance of getting back the Golan. It does promise to lift economic sanctions if Syria ceases to resist Israel and acquiesces to the permanent annexation of the Golan by Israel. Syria has made it very clear that it will not negotiate away the Golan. That leaves the region in constant upheaval. It is the source of deepening hatred on all sides."

Posted by Brian Whitaker, 26 April 2010.