I was
shocked by the events which occurred in Yemen last
December and even more saddened when I learned of the
links between the alleged perpetrators and Birmingham,
where I live, and London.
Yemen is my homeland and its welfare matters greatly
to me; I breathed its air, drank its water, grew up in
its hills and valleys, and climbed its mountains. I take
pride in Yemen’s long history of civilisation; in the
technology which built the great Marib dam; in the story
of Sulaiman and Sheba recounted in the Holy Qur’an.
Yemen became known as Arabia Felix, ‘Happy Arabia’,
a metaphor for its striking natural beauty, the
temperate climate of its highiands and its fertile
valleys. Yemenis have been more than just courageous
fighters; they have been great travellers and seamen:
their caravans plied between Hadhramaut and Damascus,
and their ships sailed to India and South East Asia.
Yemenis practised Judaism and Christianity before
embracing Islam. The Prophet described them as ‘the
mildest and most open-hearted’ of people, adding that
‘Faith is deeply rooted in Yemen, and wisdom
originates from Yemen’.
Muslims and non-Muslims have generally lived in
mutual harmony throughout the Arab and Islamic world,
and in Yemen today the existence of a small Jewish
community reflects Islam’s continuing tradition of
religious tolerance. Yemenis are well known for their
spontaneous warmth and hospitality. The violence which
took place at the end of last year should be seen in its
socio-economic and political context, as well as from an
Islamic perspective.
In the latter half of this century Yemen has suffered
enormous political and economic disability: civil wars,
political unrest, military coups etc. It is only since
the 1980s that the country has taken its first steps
towards economic prosperity and democratisation. The
expectations raised by the unification of the country in
1990, however, were sadly compromised by the bitter
political in-fighting which ended in the military
conflict of 1994.
This conflict inflicted severe damage on the
country’s economy, and Yemen was compelled to accept
the Structural Adjustment Programme drawn up by the
World Bank. The economic consequences of this programme
— the rapid rise in the cost of fuel and food — had
a strongly negative effect on the majority of the
population; people took to the streets to express their
anger and frustration.
Another strand to popular discontent was the
widespread corruption perceived at all levels of
government.
It is easy to see how those at the bottom end of
society, who lack basic medical and educational
amenities and whose lives have been made a misery by
rampant inflation, are tempted to see violence and
sabotage as a legitimate means of redressing their
grievances. At the same time, Yemeni officials may well
be right to attribute incidents such as the explosions
which have occurred from time to time in Aden, to
‘unfriendly forces’ outside the country.
What we have seen inYemen is the emergence of a small
number of unemployed, economically deprived and reckless
young men making Islam a vehicle for destruction and
sabotage. Starting from the premise that foreign oil
companies were enjoying the wealth of the country at the
expense of the Yemeni people, they argued that with the
daily bombing of Iraq and the continued occupation of
Palestine by the Jewish state, the Muslim ummah was
still at war with the West. They were therefore
justified in inflicting as much harm as possible on
‘infidel forces’ and citizens of the same origin, in
order to pressurise the governments concerned to halt
their aggression against the ummah.
Islam abhors violence in general, and the
mistreatment of prisoners of war, let alone civilian
hostages, is prohibited in Islamic jurisprudence and
regarded as a major sin; in Islam no one has the
authority to be judge and executioner. The Prophet, as
the treaty of Hodaibiya attested, preferred peaceful
means of resolving his conflict with the Quraish, even
though his followers were keen to fight the idolators of
Makkah, and to avenge the oppression suffered at their
hands.
Those who were taken hostage entered Yemen legally
and were automatically entitled to the protection,
hospitality and respect traditionally accorded to
visitors and guests. The Qur’an clearly spells out the
criteria in the following two verses:
Allah does not forbid you to deal justly and kindly
with those who did not fight against you on account of
religion, and did not drive you from your homes; for
Allah loves those who are just. (The Qur’an, 60:8)
0 ye who believe! Stand out firmly for Allah as
witnesses to fair dealing, and let not the hatred of
others cause you to do wrong. Be just: that is next to
piety; and fear Allah, for Allah is well-acquainted
with all you do. (The Qur’an, 5:8)
This sacred teaching speaks for itself. Thus the
issues raised by the events of last December have less
to do with Islam than with the underlying situation
inYemen.
We may conclude from this that only economic
development and political stability — drawing strength
in all spheres from the democratic process — will cut
the ground from under the feet of those who preach
violence in the name of religion, and enable Yemen to
become once again the ‘Arabia Felix’ of long ago.
That is my vision and fervent hope.