News and events
Search
Journal articles
Book reviews
About the Society
Society officers
Annual reports
Lecture summaries
Obituaries
Annual appeal
Membership
|
|
|
Book
review
A History
of Modern Yemen
by Paul Dresch
Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Pp. 285. Illus. Maps. Appendices. Glossary. Notes. Bibliog. Index.
Hb. & Pb. ISBN 0 521 79482 X.
Having thoroughly enjoyed Dr Dresch’s previous, primarily
anthropological book, Tribes, Government and History in Yemen (1989),
I expected good things of his work on the modern country. I was not
disappointed. This is an attractive and readable publication, with
photographs, maps and other useful illustrations. Above all, it is
well written and as appealing to the general reader as to the
specialist academic. In some ways it could be described as an
updated version of Robin Bidwell’s The Two Yemens (1983),
but presentationally, organisationally and stylistically, I prefer
Paul Dresch’s approach.
The book concentrates on the Yemen of the twentieth century
(Bidwell delved into the earlier history more extensively) and is
part of a Cambridge University Press series on the modern Middle
East. I particularly enjoyed Dresch’s treatment of Imam Yahya’s
time and his stormy relationship with the British. Given my own
involvement with the last years of British rule in South Arabia (‘rule’
may have been something of a misnomer towards the end!), I tended to
concentrate on the author’s coverage of the late 1950s and 1960s.
Here he has done well although hampered by a lack of reliable
primary source material from the Arab nationalist ‘side’ in
South Arabia, as opposed to extensive English language accounts.
Someone needs to persuade the chief actors in the National
Liberation Front to come forward with an objective first hand
version of their activities before the surviving main players leave
the stage altogether. Inevitably in a book spanning a century, this
short if traumatic decade marking the twilight of Empire is covered
somewhat superficially. But the sense is clear enough. The sad
history of muddle, lack of vision, indecision and, in the end, a
fatal loss of will by HMG, emerges starkly from the thirty or so
pages dealing with the 1962 revolution in the north, entanglement of
the Egyptians, and the demise of the British in the south.
Perhaps the most valuable feature of this excellent volume is
Dresch’s account of the post-colonial period - especially when he
carries on from where Bidwell stopped and explains how the two
Yemens, neo-Marxist in the south, inherently conservative in the
north (despite years of ‘republicanism’), finally merged. As a
young political officer in the 1960s, I would have wagered my entire
(albeit modest) gratuity against unity in my lifetime, dismissing
the prospect as a chimera induced by fleeting anti-colonial
sentiment rather than anything more substantial and enduring. The
post-imperial road to scenes of crowds chanting on both sides of the
former border: ‘ba’d al yawm ma’ad baramil’ (‘after today
no more barrels’ i. e. concrete ftlled drums marking the frontier
checkpoints) was a rocky one.
Obstacles included the unequal balance of populations - 11
million in the north overwhelming the 2. 5 million in the south;
opposition from Saudi Arabia; the conflicting ambitions of
politicians and tribal leaders; the divisive effect of the dying
years of the cold war on Arab regional development. But against all
odds union came about, in the shadow of Saddam’s adventure in
Kuwait and the emergence of the United States as sole superpower in
the so-called ‘New World Order’.
PETER HINCHCLIFFE
|