by Fred Halliday
Reprint by Saqi Books, 2002. Pp. 540. Illus. Maps. Figures.
Index. Pb. £17.95. ISBN 0-86356-381-3.
Does the cover say it all? The original paperback of Professor
Halliday’s Arabia without Sultans — as I remember it —
featured a caricature of an Arabian shaikh (cruelly resembling the
late King Faisal) being poached in a vat of oil. The cover of this
reprinted version has a colour photograph of a middle-aged Gulf
Arab, at the door of his brightly painted cement house, with the
portly figure and thoughtful air of a stakeholder in the market
economy.
Poets tend to be shy of their juvenilia, but Professor Halliday
has reprinted his first work, written when he was 28, in all its
pristine fervour and with a surprisingly brief introduction. Much
has changed in the 28 years since Arabia without Sultans first
appeared, but with the exception of the Shah (not of course an Arab,
but included and receiving almost indulgent treatment by the young
Halliday’s standards), the King, the Sultan and the Shaikhs still
lord it over non- Yemeni Arabia. Only the young Halliday’s
favourite state, the People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen, has
passed away, lacerated by tribal strife and orphaned by the collapse
of the Soviet Union, while the various revolutionary popular fronts
have fallen silent. The threat to traditional rule in Arabia now
comes from the Islamists rather than the Leninists.
In fairness, the author in his introduction admits to being
surprised by the ‘surprises’ of history, but he selects themes
from the original text which are still relevant: the impact of oil
on Arabian societies and the need for transparency in discovering
where oil revenues have gone; the importance of the Saudi-Yemeni
relationship; the impact of internal politics on national policy;
and finally the need for a secular non-Islamic approach to society
and politics. These are certainly important and enduring themes, but
history might have been less surprising if the young historian
himself had been less blinkered.
The original text has some virtues — a very wide range of
sources, from the pamphlets and periodicals of the revolutionary
groups to British regimental journals, and the footnotes offer a mezzeh
of fascinating facts, distortions and opinions. (The hot chilli
must be his praise for Albania’s ‘short but intense history’
of socialism as a model for Yemeni socialists). Accounts of the
young Halliday’s visits to South Yemen and Dhofar in 1970 and 1973
are interesting as is the oral history he collected from some of the
principal actors in Aden. In 1974 the amount of material in English
gathered in his pages was certainly impressive.
But the relentlessly partisan approach of the author, the Marxist
spectacles through which he views Arabia and his rigid
categorisation of the various protagonists (feudal/ bourgeois/
proletarian; progressive/reactionary) present a cartoon world,
already far from reality in 1974 and one which has drifted further
into fantasy as the years have passed. The acid cynicism with which
he describes the traditional rulers and their imperialist masters is
in stark contrast to his suspension of disbelief when he visits Aden
and Dhofar. Did he not notice — on his second visit to Dhofar —
that the revolution was already in retreat? He can be forgiven for
not forecasting the collapse of the Soviet Union, but did he not
discern the tribal fissures which underlay and finally destroyed the
Communist regime in Aden?
Of course it is a book of its time as the author acknowledges in
his introduction, but its value today is more as an exhibit in a
museum of political attitudes than a work of measured analysis. Yet
it may stand as a salutary counterweight to the memoirs of senior
British officials and to Foreign Office papers in the Public Records
Office, access to which must now have reached 1972.
The story which I should like to read is an account of the long
march which transformed the young militant into the mellow and
perceptive academic who lectured to the British- Yemeni and
Anglo-Omani Societies in October 1999, before proceeding to Oman to
speak to the Sultan’s diplomats.
DAVID TATHAM