News and events
Search
Journal articles
Book reviews
About the Society
Society officers
Annual reports
Lecture summaries
Obituaries
Annual appeal
Membership
|
|
|
Book
review
Island of
the Phoenix
An Ethnographic Study of the people of Socotra
Vitaly Naumkin
Ithaca Press
Vitaly Naumkin, of the Institute of
Oriental Studies in Moscow, conducted research in Socotra between the mid-1970s and 1987,
latterly as part of a joint Soviet-Yemeni team, but it is only with this publication (well
translated by Valerie Epstein) that most of us can acquaint ourselves with the findings of
this project (earlier publications having been published in Russian).
The scope of this large book (422 pages including index) is wider
than the subtitle suggests. The first 134 pages (plus 22 pages of appendices) describe the
islands geography, climate, geology, history, archaeology and the physical
characteristics of the Socotrans. Anyone interested in southern Arabia will find much of
this material engrossing - especially the chapter on the history of Socotra based on
Arabic and western sources. That said, some of the topics in this first third of the book
are of doubtful relevance in an ethnography, and/or are treated in unnecessary detail
-especially the highly technical accounts of early land formation, excavations and of
investigations into Socotras racial types. For most readers summaries
would have sufficed.
The bulk of the book is devoted to ethnographic topics, with
chapters on the Socotran economy, material culture, marriage and kinship, and magic,
ritual and religion, and a concluding chapter on the neighbouring island of Abd al-Kuri.
The most interesting and useful accounts are of the traditional Socotran economy - based
on animal herding and date palm cultivation in the hilly interior and fishing on the coast
- and of the material culture, covering husbandry methods, food processing, craft
production, agricultural activities, fishing and pearling, clothing, settlement patterns
and housing.
Unfortunately the value of the ethnographic information is
undermined by the authors weak methodology and analysis, and by glaring gaps in the
data. Information was collected from all over Socotra by means of surveys and formal
interviews, but it does not appear that the researchers became intimately familiar with
any community. Perhaps because of this the text alternates between detailed descriptions
and tables of survey results from which inadequate conclusions are drawn, and
generalisations and normative statements for which scant evidence is provided. What is
consistently missing is explanatory context.
Although the research spanned more than a decade of dramatic
change, and social development appears to be one of the authors concerns,
quantitative data (for example on prices and herd sizes) and other economic information
collected by the researchers is undated (When is now?) so there is no way of assessing the
local effects of such factors as the oil boom or out-migration for work. The treatment of
social topics also lacks essential context. Though there are references to indigenous
political and status categories such as clans tribes,
leaders and sayyids, and state institutions or officials are
occasionally mentioned, there is no overall description of the social structure, nor of
how it operated before and after Socotra was absorbed into the PDRY. (Incredibly we are
not even told the sizes of different groups nor even the population of Socotra!) Nor is
any attempt made to analyse the inter-relations of different aspects of Socotran life -
for example herding practices with tribal organisation, or status differences and income
levels with bride price -and insufficient information is provided for the reader to draw
his own conclusions. Perhaps understandably in view of the language difficulties and the
Soviet Unions isolation, there is also a dearth of references to the large
anthropological literature on the Yemen and on relevant theoretical concerns, and such
theories as are posited, for example the dual divisions of tribes and marriage
preferences, seem archaic and out of touch. The overall impression is of an assemblage of
fascinating but incomplete ethnographic data hanging in space.
SHELAGH WEIR, November 1994
|