Rumblings
from a distant outbreak of democracy
by Brian Whitaker
Originally published in The Guardian, 4 January
19 92
WHEN Yemenis go to the polls later this year [1992] in the country's
first multi-party elections they will do more than choose a new government. The election,
which will mark the final stage of transforming Yemen into a fully democratic state, is
likely to cause vibrations throughout the Arabian peninsula - a region where parliaments,
if they exist at all, have limited power, where "consultative councils" with
appointed members the preferred alternative, and where cabinet meetings tend to be family
gatherings of brothers, uncles and cousins. This
dramatic political change in Yemen is actually the by-product of another process:
unification. Although it has been known as Yemen since early Islamic times, throughout
most of the country's history the mountainous terrain, with thousands of isolated
villages, has prevented any kind of single, centralised control. Since the British left
Aden in 1967 Yemen had been two states: the Marxist (and partly secularised) south which
depended for its survival on aid from the Soviet Union and Eastern bloc, and the north
where more traditional Arab-Islamic values held sway.
While dreams of unity became an essential part of
the political rhetoric on both sides, for years the mutual incompatibility of the two
systems prevented anything being done about it. What eventually brought the two sides
together was a rapid decline in Soviet support for the south: aid fell from from $400
million in 1988 to $50 million a year later. Having lost its funds and its political
raison d'être, the south began to see union with the north as the only practical option.
Unlike the two Germanies, Yemeni unification, proclaimed
in May 1990, was more of a merger than a takeover - though the south, with only one-fifth
of the north's population, was clearly the junior partner. The northern president, General
Ali Abdullah Salih, became head of state and Ali Salim al-Baid, secretary-general of the
southern Socialist Party became vice-president.
A new constitution was approved by a referendum and a
transitional power-sharing parliament set up, combining members of the old northern
Consultative Council with those of the southern Supreme People's Council, plus 31 new
members nominated to represent previously banned opposition groups. There are 10 women MPs
The parliament has more power than most in the Arab world
and its televised debates attract huge audiences. It is, however, only a temporary body,
allotted a 30-month lifespan to oversee the details of unification and prepare for
elections.
When Yemen opted for a multi-party system few could have
imagined just how multi it would become: today there are 41 parties, including Ba'athists,
Nasserists, religious factions and individual sheikhs with a personal following. However,
only three of these are large enough to be considered important: the General People's
Congress (GPC), the Socialist Party and Islah ("Reform").
The GPC is not quite a political party in the normal
sense; before unification it was an umbrella organisation designed to incorporate all the
various political forces in the north. Since then some elements, notably Islah, have left
to form their own parties.
The GPC's policies are based on its 1982 charter which the
assistant general secretary, Yahya Mutawakkel, describes as reflecting "Islamic,
national and modern views". The party's attraction, he says, is that "we are not
fanatic in the Islamic area and not leftist. We have a very good history." Also, he
adds, "The president is party chairman. He has influence."
The Socialist Party, which formerly ruled the south, is
developing its programme for "a centralised government of law and order, equality,
modernisation, democracy and freedom". It lays special emphasis on removing
"abnormal privileges" and helping the unemployed and those on low incomes.
One of its attractions over the GPC, according to
Djarallah Omar, a member of the central committee, is that "our renewal/modernisation
programme is more defined and determined, for example on the status of women".
There have been suggestions that the party, following the
example of east European communists, might change its name. The idea is controversial, Mr
Omar says, but whatever the name, "it's a socialist, democratic party".
The party does face some difficulties, however. Earlier
this month a member of the secretariat was shot dead from a passing car, and several of
the party's offices have come under attack. Armed guards are now stationed in the
corridors of its Sana'a headquarters.
Islah lists its most important aims as adherence to
shari'a law and the protection of democracy and the multi-party system. Islah draws most
of its support - perhaps 75% - through conservative tribal sheikhs, notably the powerful
Sheikh Abdullah bin Hussein al-Ahmar. There is also a small element influenced by the
ideas of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood which opponents claim forms the party's
intellectual driving force.
Mr Mutawakkel of the GPC says: "Some of Islah are
fanatical. You should hear the speeches in mosques and religious schools. Islah objected
to all paragraphs in the new constitution that concentrated on giving people freedom of
belief and economic practice."
The Socialist Party, with its roots in Aden where fewer
women are veiled and alcohol is sold and even openly consumed on the streets, has even
more fundamental differences with Islah. "They are not sure about democracy," Mr
Omar says. "They want to use democracy more than practise it. Also we differ on human
rights and liberties."
At Islah, Mohammed Abdullah al-Yadoumi, a member of
political bureau, protests: "We are certainly not fundamentalists. Since start of
party activities we have done nothing that can be described as extremist."
The Yemeni constitution stipulates that Islamic law is the
"basic source" of legislation - implying that it is not the only source. Would
Islah like to stiff en this? Mr Yadoumi thinks not. "If there's a good commitment to
apply it, that 's all right. The practice is the most important thing," he said.
Yemen at present has no Islamic banks. Would Islah treat
this as a priority? Mr Yadoumi thought for a while, then said "Islamic banking should
be a final objective - people should be free to choose."
Probably there is an element of political knockabout in
the accusations against Islah. Outside observers largely agree that by Middle Eastern
standards even the most militant members of Islah are relatively moderate. It is also
clear that Islah, as the main anti-government party, is drawing support from a variety of
disaffected quarters, and there must be some doubt as to how long it can hold these
disparate groups together.
WHAT impact these newspapers will have on the forthcoming
elections is hard to judge. The majority sell only a few thousand copies and are rarely
seen outside the cities. Even so, it would be a mistake to assume the non-reading public
are either ill-informed or politically unsophisticated.
In remote villages - and perhaps especially there - people
have time to think, debate and - above all - listen to the radio. Farmers sighting a
stranger will, after the barest exchange of pleasantries, ask earnest questions like
"What do you think the Americans will do to Libya about Lockerbie?", "Is it
true that Maxwell was an Israeli spy?" or "Do you believe that Jesus is really
dead?"
After a couple of encounters along these lines you realise
that the questioners are not seeking information but inviting you to debate a given topic.
Venture an opinion and you will be confronted with an unnerving array of evidence and
arguments that either back up or politely refute what you have said, and leave your own
thoughts on the matter seeming rather feeble.
Facts and figures that you have vaguely heard or
half-forgotten are retained by the Yemenis, to be recalled at a moment's notice with
startling precision. The number of tons of explosives that the Americans dropped on Iraq -
and how it compares with the number used in Vietnam, of which Saudi princes have been seen
in which London nightclubs.
Possibly this is a consequence of the afternoon
qat-chewing sessions - unique to Yemen and the highlands of east Africa. As the juice of
the leaves takes effect, serious, often very deep, conversation flows, quite unlike the
sentimental jollity of a British pub.
NONE of the three has so far published a manifesto, though
all are planning to hold conferences in the spring where they will set out their political
wares.
The elections are expected between May and November next
year, though sceptics suggest they might be postponed if there are signs of public
disorder. There have also been hints from some Socialists that elections should wait until
the unification process has been completed. The reason is not hard to see. In the present
parliament the socialists are over-represented in population terms; new constituency
boundaries mean they are almost certain to lose seats in the election unless they can win
new support in the north; a delay would give them more time to organise. One the other
hand, President Salih's GPC has everything to gain by holding the elections on schedule,
and might even try to bring them forward to reduce the chances of organised disruption.
Most observers believe the GPC will emerge are the largest
party, with Islah second and the socialists third. That would probably mean another
GPC-Socialist coalition, though the GPC might also seek to fragment the opposition through
an alliance with parts of Islah.
The Socialists, however, claim there could be some
surprises. On past form, there will also be more than a little skulduggery. But it would
be wrong to underestimate the collective cunning of the Yemeni electorate. During the
recent constitutional referendum, Saudi interests are said to have bribed the men of
Sa'ada (the northernmost border province) to stay away from the polls. The men happily
took the money but sent their wives out to vote in droves. Sa'ada's polling stations had
the highest female turnout in the country. Not at all what the Saudis had expected.
|