QAT
BAN FAILS IN U.S.
November 25: A series of failed prosecutions for qat
possession has cast doubt on whether Yemen’s favourite pastime
is illegal throughout the United States.
Although qat (or "khat") is not specifically
mentioned in federal drugs law, and in only a few state laws, it
is regarded by police as an illicit drug. Prosecutions usually occur because of two alkaloids found in qat:
cathine
and cathinone
Cathine was banned by federal law in 1988, and cathinone in
1993. Local laws in many American states banned both substances in
1988, but some states took no action against qat until the federal
ban on cathinone came into effect in 1993.
When making arrests for qat, police usually charge the suspect
with possession of cathinone (since it is a Schedule I drug),
rather than cathine, which is only Schedule III or, in some parts
of the US, Schedule IV. The reason for this is that the more serious the charge, the
better it looks on the arresting officer’s career record.
In fact, the amount of cathinone in qat is tiny: about 36 parts
in every 100,000 when it is freshly picked. But cathinone is
unstable and it rapidly degrades into cathine. Qat smuggled into
the US a day or two after picking is therefore likely to contain
only slight traces of cathinone.
Nevertheless, according to one lawyer, police who seize 100
pounds of qat are liable to claim that they have nabbed "100
pounds of Schedule I narcotics" - which, again, looks good on
their career record.
Qat’s larger ingredient, cathine, can be found in salt form,
as pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, in Sudafed, Dexatrim, and other
non-prescription medicines.
Under US law, people must be given "fair notice" that
a substance is illegal - which in practice means that it must
appear on the banned list.
A law-abiding citizen who wanted to check the legality of qat
before buying it would not find it on the federal list nor on the
local list in most American states. It would also be unreasonable
to expect the average person to know that qat leaves contain
cathinone and cathine, two items which do appear on the lists.
In this respect, the law’s failure to mention qat is
different from the way it treats other drugs of vegetable origin.
For example, "marijuana" is listed in addition to its
active ingredient, THC; "coca leaves" are listed in
addition to cocaine.
Lack of "fair notice" has now been accepted as a
defence against charges of qat possession by courts in at least
six American states. One lawyer recently told Yemen Gateway that
he had obtained qat 14 acquittals in a row by using this defence.
Outside Yemen and parts East Africa, where qat is widely
chewed, legal attitudes vary greatly. In Britain, where qat is
legal, its use is mainly confined to members of the Yemeni and
Somali communities and their friends, and it has caused no social
problems. Chewing is a slow, rather messy business, so it is
unlikely ever to catch on as a "club culture" drug where
people usually seek an instant high.
Prosecutions in the United States sometimes look more like a
way of victimising ethnic minorities than maintaining law and
order.
In the light of recent court rulings, the US could decide to
amend its laws to include qat, by name, as a banned substance. A
more sensible course would be not to tighten the law immediately
but to suspend prosecutions and see if that leads to any real
problems.
See Yemen Gateway's
QAT PAGE
NO
NEWS ... GOOD NEWS
NOVEMBER 15: We scarcely
dare mention this for fear that it may tempt disaster, but here
goes: no foreigners have been taken hostage in Yemen for five
months. This is the longest period without a kidnapping since
1996.
We doubt that Alberto Alessio, the
40-year-old chairman of an Italian archaeology foundation, who was
kidnapped in Marib on June 16 and held for four days, will be
Yemen's last foreign hostage, but even so the signs are
encouraging.
With almost 11 months gone, there
have been only five kidnaps this year
involving foreigners, compared with 10 or more in each of the last
three years. And the total of foreigners kidnapped this year is
only seven so far, compared with 27 in 1999, 42 in 1998 and 50 in
1997.
The Yemeni government always
maintained that the kidnaps, or at least many of them, were
instigated by Saudi Arabia in furtherance of the border dispute.
We reserve judgment on that, but it is interesting to note that
the most recent kidnap took place just as the border dispute was
being settled.
Another explanation is that there
are simply fewer opportunities for the kidnappers. Foreigners who
go to Yemen are more aware of the risks, and take care. Security
is also tighter: police permits are needed even for visits to
places such as Shibam/Kawkaban, just a few miles outside Sana’a.
Continuing awareness and care
should help tourism to recover, but it will take time. Such is
Yemen’s reputation now that on a recent visit to Sana'a we met
several tourists who had lied to family and friends about
their destination, to avoid alarming them.
One - who had told his mother he
was surfing in Sharm al-Sheikh - even had a map, helpfully marked
by staff at the Italian embassy, showing all the places where
foreigners had been kidnapped: places he was making sure to avoid.
EMBASSY
BOMB
SANA’A, 14 October: A
bomb hit the British Embassy in Yemen yesterday, only hours after
a suicide attack on an American warship in the south of the
country which killed 17 people and injured 35.
The blast, just after 6 am in the Yemeni capital, Sana’a,
caused "considerable damage", according to an embassy
official.
Guards were on duty at the front of the building, but the bomb
appeared to have been thrown over the wall of the embassy compound
from waste land at the side.
No one was hurt but windows of the Chancery building – which
includes the ambassador’s office - were smashed and an outer
wall was blackened by smoke. Officials would not comment on the
internal damage. Windows of an adjacent school were also broken.
EXPLOSION
IN ADEN
SANA’A, 13 October: The
United States says the explosion which blew a 12-metre hole in
the USS Cole as it refuelled in Aden yesterday was a terrorist
act, carried out by suicide bombers.
Yemen's initial reaction was that
the explosion probably not a deliberate act, though the
authorities acted swiftly to demonstrate their concern. President
Ali Abdullah Salih was shown on Yemeni television visiting the
injured in hospital.
The state-run television said that
President Salih has spoken by telephone to US Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright and had "clarified to Albright that
present information indicates that it was not a deliberate
act."
The US says that a small boat from
the harbour, which had been helping to moor the guided missile
destroyer, pulled alongside it. As it drew close, two men on the
boat stood to attention and saluted – at which point it
exploded.
Some Yemeni witnesses say there
was a fire on the warship before it exploded, but the US says the
hole in the warship, which is just above the waterline, was caused
by the Yemeni boat exploding. It says the damage indicates and
explosion from outside the warship, not from inside.
Yemen has been plagued by
generally low-level terrorism for many years. Following the Afgan
war, many Muslim fighters took refuge there, taking advantage of
lax security, the ready availability of weapons, and the rugged
terrain to use it as a base for training and activities in other
countries.
Usama bin Laden, whose family
originally came from southern Yemen, has maintained links with the
country, and he has a number of followers there.
Southern Yemen, under Marxist
rule, was classified by the US as a "rogue state". The
Marxists provided Carlos the Jackal with a passport. But Yemen was
removed from the US list when the south and north of Yemen were
unified in 1990.
For several years, Yemen has been
quietly nurturing its relations with the United States, despite
opposition from some sections of public opinion.
Relations have moved a long way
since 1990-91 when Yemen's attitude to the conflict with Saddam
Hussein led to American aid being cut off. In 1997, during the
arms inspection crisis with Iraq, Yemen kept a noticeably low
profile. Later, following the bombings of the US embassies in
Kenya and Tanzania last August, President Salih wasted no time in
sending condolences to President Clinton - though one of the
bombing suspects carried a Yemeni passport.
In 1998, Yemen and the United
States held their first joint military exercises, and the US
provided help with clearing mines left behind by the 1994 civil
war.
There have been persistent rumours
- denied by the Yemeni government - that the US would like to
establish a military base in Yemen. Although the government sees
good relations with the US as vital to its long-term interests, it
has had had to endure criticism of its policy at home -
particularly from Islamists, but also from some nationalists.
Two years ago, opponents of
military co-operation circulated a document entitled: "US
Department of State: Report on some important issues for
1998" which claimed, among other things, that the US Marines
had established a base in Aden.
The US Embassy in Sana'a said the
document was a forgery containing "numerous lies". A
spokesman said: "The United States does not have - and does
not intend to establish - any military bases in Yemen."
However, the US has been using
Aden for oil bunkering and resupply of its fleet.
American involvement in Yemen was
one of the grievances of the so-called Islamic Army of Aden-Abyan,
which kidnapped 16 mainly British tourists in southern Yemen at
the end of 1998. Four of the tourists died during a rescue by
Yemeni security forces, and the leader of the Islamic Army was
later executed.
A group of young Muslim men from
Britain had earlier been arrested on terrorism charges and were
alleged to have been plotting attacks on various US and British
targets in Aden. The Yemenis believed that the tourists were
kidnapped in the hope of securing their release.
The men were linked to Abu Hamza
al-Masri, the imam of Finsbury Park mosque in London, who runs an
organisation called Supporters of Sharia. After kidnapping the
tourists, the leader of the Islamic Army called Abu Hamza by
satellite phone.
Although any attackers would have
had little forewarning of the arrival of the USS Cole in Aden, all
activity involving the US military is watched closely by local
opponents of the co-operation.
If yesterday's explosion turns out
to have occurred in the way suggested by the Americans, it would
have needed considerable planning, with infiltrators obtaining
jobs in Aden port.
There is no suggestion of
involvement by the Yemeni authorities, but there are certainly a
number of people in Yemen who would not only approve of such an
attack - especially in the light of the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict - but would be willing to co-operate with it.
THE JIHAD
EXPERIENCE
JULY 11: It’s happened
again. Less than two years after Abu
Hamza’s lads went "on holiday" to Yemen in
search of the Jihad experience and ended up in jail, we find 30
Britons studying an extreme version of Islam at what is variously described as
"a religious institute" or "a camp".
One of them, who went out to Yemen
when he was only 15, was shot dead on July 8. The story, not
entirely convincing, is that a fellow Briton killed him
accidentally while cleaning a gun.
If it were simply a matter of
learning about Islam there would be no need to go to Yemen. There
are almost two million Muslims in Britain; books and cassettes
about the faith are freely available; there are hundreds of
mosques. But in British mosques, people don’t have guns.
Wad'aa Religious Institute - or camp - is in Sa’ada province, in the
wild far north of Yemen. Foreigners are not encouraged to go there
because of the risk of kidnapping.
The version of Islam taught there
is not mainstream, but Salafi. "The movement is considered
one of the largest and most radical Islamic movements in the
country," the Yemen Times said yesterday in an email to its
subcsribers. "They have accused many other Islamic groups of
infidelity, and have spread their own religious thoughts and
beliefs to a large sector of the foreigners who turned to
Islam." (See Yemen Times report on on
the Salafieh movement and its founder)
The dead youth, Hosea Walker,
appears to have been a convert to Islam who was accompanied to
Yemen by his elder brother, 17-year-old Malachi.
There have been reports of some
Islamic leaders in Britain recruiting youngsters to attend
training camps abroad, in the United States, Afghanistan and
Pakistan. Some are later sent to fight in Chechnya and elsewhere.
In Yemen, there have also been
reports of youngsters being offered large sums of money to fight
in Chechnya.
ISRAELI
TOURIST BOOM
APRIL 9: So, Yemen is at
last enjoying a tourist boom. Three groups of Israeli tourists
have arrived in the space of a fortnight and a fourth is said to
be on the way.
These are not, however, typical
tourists. Typical tourists do not include the inside of the prime
minister's office or the parliamentary Speaker's house in their
proposed sightseeing intinerary. Typical tourists do not have
their travels reported in detail by the media back home.
Ostensibly, the tourists are in
Yemen to visit relatives among the country's small Jewish
community, but there's little doubt that their main purpose is to
open up further cracks in Arab solidarity against Israel.
The fact that this has happened at
a critical stage in the Middle East peace process, and that it
coincided with President Salih's official visit to the United
States, cannot be an accident.
Several weeks ago, Yemen's foreign
minister complained that his country was being pressurised by the
United States into normalising relations with Israel. Then there
were the antics of the Israeli ambassador in Amman, who kept
phoning the Yemeni embassy and asking to speak to the ambassador
(who contrived never to be available).
Someone, clearly, has decided to
try to "pick off" Yemen. Possibly similar moves
are under way in other Arab countries, but Yemen is more exposed than
most: it has a Jewish community and it badly needs help and
support from the United States. Salih, when he went to the White
House, was looking for favours from Clinton and Clinton, in turn,
was looking for favours from Salih.
In the official statement after
their meeting, Clinton went so far as to praise Yemen's new
attitude to Israeli tourists. Back in Yemen, meanwhile, there is
uproar from large sections of the opposition.
It is not clear, though, whether
much has really changed. Yemen has allowed Jews to visit the
country for many years, and some of them have been welcomed
personally by high-level government figures. The issue has always
been one of documentation: Israeli passports, or others with an
Israeli stamp are not allowed. Claims that the first tourist group
used Israeli passports to enter the country (as opposed to
carrying them in their bags) have not been confirmed, and they are
said to have presented American and British passports on arrival
at their hotel. The most recent group seems to have got travel
documents through the Yemeni delegation to the UN.
Whatever technical devices have
been used, the Yemeni government can claim that the official
boycott of Israel stands, while President Clinton and the Israelis
can claim that it doesn't - and congratulate Yemen for being so
helpful.
But where does this leave the US
State Department, whose advice is that tourists should not travel
to Yemen? Rather belatedly, the Israeli Foreign Ministry has also
advised tourists to avoid visiting Yemen "before there are
more fitting security arrangements".
FRONTIERS
OF JOURNALISM
FEBRUARY 24: A Yemeni
journalist has been banned from his profession for life after
writing an article which was considered "insulting to Saudi
Arabia and harming the interests of Yemen". Jamal Amer was
also fined $31 and the newspaper he works for, the Nasserist
al-Wahdawi, has been shut down for a month. [Report: Reuters]
There are few Yemenis who have
not, at some time, been rude about the Saudis. It’s as much a
national pastime as the British insulting the French. It may not
be an enlightened way to behave, but when the British newspaper,
the Sun, printed the headline "HOP OFF, YOU FROGS!"
nobody tried to close it down.
Meanwhile Qassem Sallam, Ba’athist
leader and a member of the Consultative Council (appointed by the
president) is threatened with prosecution for writing an editorial
in his party newspaper, al-Ihyaa al-Arabi, accusing Saudi Arabia
of "expansionist ambitions". Mr Sallam is claiming that
he cannot be prosecuted because he has parliamentary immunity. [Report: AFP]
Until recently, the Yemeni
government was not altogether unhappy to see anti-Saudi talk in
opposition newspapers. Far from "harming the interests of
Yemen", it helped to rally people round the flag in the midst
of a border dispute.
From a legal viewpoint, both
writers seem to have fallen foul of Article 103 of the press
law - a catch-all clause which forbids the publishing of
"false" information. This gives the authorities wide
powers to punish journalists for vaguely-defined offences. In
practice the law has been used rather less in Yemen than similar
laws in other Arab countries, but its use appears to be on the
increase.
The motivation behind both cases
is almost certainly the border negotiations between Yemen and
Saudi Arabia which have reached a crucial stage. Possibly the
Yemeni government is trying to prepare public opinion - after
years of hostility - for a settlement.
Although the frontier line is the
main issue, it is not the only one. There is a long history of
mutual suspicion between the two neighbours, and of interference
(actual or perceived) in each other’s internal affairs.
The framework for the current
talks is the 1995 Memorandum of
Understanding, brokered by the Americans, which seeks to
reduce tension and encourage co-operation between Yemen and Saudi
Arabia in various ways. Article 8 of the memorandum says:
Both countries confirm existing
obligations whereby their territories will not be used as bases
or centres of aggression against the other: nor will they be
used for political, military or propaganda purposes against the
other party …
This also helps to explain the
latest action against Yemeni newspapers and, in a slightly
different arena, the current high-level discussions about the
future of Mowj.
MOWJ
AND THE BORDER
FEBRUARY 22: The Yemeni
government is coming under pressure to accept a reconciliation
with Mowj, the exiled opposition group, as part of a border
settlement with Saudi Arabia.
Mowj comprises various southern
elements who in 1994 attempted to secede from Yemen and establish
a separate state in the south. They were defeated by northern
forces in a brief war and their leaders fled the country.
Although the southerners had their
own motives for fighting, they received strong backing from Saudi
Arabia. Northern leaders maintain that the separatists had struck
a border deal with the Saudis in return for this support. It is
claimed that if the separatists had succeeded, they would have granted
the Saudis a land corridor through southern Yemen to the Arabian
Sea.
After the war, Mowj set up
headquarters in London, where it has waged a propaganda campaign
against the Sana’a government - though it has largely abandoned
its calls for separatism.
From his London exile, the Mowj
leader, Abd al-Rahman al-Jifri, has frequently called for
"national reconciliation". In 1998, however, the
separatist leaders were tried in their absence by a Yemeni court
on treason charges. Five were sentenced to death but al-Jifri
himself was merely given a suspended sentence, leaving open the
possibility that he might eventually return to Yemen.
Recently Mowj has been in contact
with various mainstream political figures in Yemen, including
President Salih’s party. Some of these contacts are reported in
this week’s Yemen
Times, which also includes an interview with
al-Jifri.
Towards the end of January, Mowj
representatives visited the US State Department, where they put
their case to Diana Shelby, head of the Yemen and Oman section.
Mowj later described the talks as "positive and useful".
The representatives apparently believe they succeeded in
persuading the Americans that rehabilitation of Mowj should be
included in an overall settlement.
A couple of weeks later, US
Assistant Secretary of State Edward Walker arrived in Sana’a,
where he met President Salih and offered to mediate in the border
dispute.
A reconciliation with Mowj would
certainly cause an upheaval in the delicate political balance
within Yemen and, at first sight, there is no pressing reason why
President Salih would agree to it. However, some Yemeni sources
suggest that deteriorating relations between the government and
powerful sheikhs in northern Yemen may persuade the president to
strike a deal with al-Jifri.
A CURIOUS
KIDNAPPING
FEBRUARY 10: In the long
and monotonously repetitive catalogue of Yemeni kidnappings, the
abduction of Kenneth White on the night of January 25-26 stands
out as one of the oddest.
The pattern of tribal
kidnappings in Yemen is all too familiar. A vehicle is
intercepted on a country road - often in the Marib area - and the
occupants are whisked away to a mountain village. The kidnappers
make their demands, giving away their identity and the location of
their hostages in the process. Security forces surround the area
and, if possible, arrest a few relatives of the kidnappers. A
stand-off ensues until, eventually, the hostages are released.
From start to finish, the typical kidnapping is relatively
unsophisticated and, in some cases, hopelessly amateurish.
Mr White, an American oil worker,
was indeed kidnapped in the Marib area, but there the similarities
end. He was abducted at night, from his bedroom in the secure
compound of the company he worked for, Halliburton. Several other
foreigners slept on nearby, undisturbed. The alarm was raised next
day when a wire fence surrounding the compound was found to have
been cut. The kidnappers had also skilfully covered the tracks of
their getaway vehicle. In the words of the Yemen Times, it was the
most professional kidnapping that Yemen has seen.
Unusually for Yemen, the security
forces seemed to have no idea where Mr White was being held.
On January 28, the Associated Press news agency, citing "a
Western diplomat and a tribal source", reported that a second
American kidnapped at a petrol station in the southern province of
Shabwa. The story was quickly retracted in the face of emphatic
official denials, though it did contain an element of truth. An
American hostage HAD been seen at the petrol station, but there
had not been a second kidnapping: the hostage in Shabwa was Mr
White.
This gave the first clear indication that Mr White's abduction
was not a local tribal affair, and that that his kidnappers had a
southern connection.
The next twist in the tale came on February 1 when the
government made the extaordinary claim that the kidnapping was
connected with a land dispute in Aden, and that unnamed leaders of
the Islah party were behind it - an accusation which Islah
promptly denied.
In the confusion following the 1994 war and the defeat of the
southern separatists, large amounts of property in southern cities
changed hands, by fair means or foul. Some was simply grabbed;
some was given as a reward to supporters of the victorious
northern side. It was around this time that a company called Munkadh
obtained a large piece of land which was required for the Aden
Free Zone.
It is not known how Munkadh acquired the land (though readers
are welcome to email us
with information). In any case, Yemeni property law is in such a
mess that, as one expert at a conference in Exeter noted in 1998,
it is not uncommon for two different people to have legally valid
titles to the same property.
As the intended use of the land
was already known, Munkadh's acquisition seems to have been an
unusually low-risk speculation with the possibility of a very high
return. The government, however, did not take kindly to Munkadh's
ploy - which would explain why Munkadh allegedly commissioned Mr
White's kidnapping to back up its $400 million
"compensation" claim.
Munkadh, meanwhile, is said by the
government to be owned by people connected to Islah but so far
there is no indication of their names or what their involvement
with Islah really is.
There could, of course, be some
deeper political intrigue behind the government's desire to link
the affair with Munkadh and Islah. But there is no doubt that Mr
White's kidnapping has touched on some sensitive spots. The
reports of his release, on February 10, were notable for their
brevity and lack of information about what actually happened. |